When, Exactly?
The EV Mandate They Haven’t Actually Killed
Back in February, the Liberal government announced they were repealing the Electric Vehicle mandate. You might remember hearing about this. It was the policy that would have forced Canadians into buying electric vehicles whether they wanted them or not, whether they could afford them or not, and whether it made any sense for their lives or not.
Conservatives made a big push on this in the House of Commons because we recognized the significant threat it posed to auto manufacturing, affordability, and the personal choices that Canadians ought to be able to make. Nobody wants to be told what kind of vehicle they’re allowed to drive – especially if that vehicle isn’t ideal for driving long distances in sub-zero temperatures without the infrastructure necessary to even do it.
I’m glad that the Liberal government came to their senses and finally listened. But when they said they were going to repeal the mandate, I had one simple question.
When?
So I filed an Order Paper Question. This is a written question tabled in the House of Commons that the government must answer within 45 days. Question Q-913 was simple:
"With regard to the government's announcement on February 5, 2026, that it would be repealing the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard: on what date will it be repealed?"
The kind of question you'd ask a contractor who promised to fix your roof. When will the work be done?
Here's what they gave us:
"The Government is working to repeal the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard for the 2026 model year. The exact date of the Canada Gazette publication formally repealing the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard requirements will be announced at a later date."
Mid-April. Forty-five days later. That's their answer. Bureaucratic word salad that translates to: we'll get around to it. Maybe. Eventually. Trust us.
There’s good news and bad news. The good news is that they claim the mandate will be repealed in 2026 – this year. But the bad news is that they didn’t attach any targets or dates, or anything else to go along with it.
The underlying message here is that they want credit for repealing the mandate without actually repealing the mandate. They want the positive headlines and the photo ops while keeping the policy alive in the background. It's the oldest trick in the Liberal playbook: they announce something popular, drag their feet on getting it done, and hope everyone forgets time come the next election.
But there’s also a bigger theory at play here, and here's why it matters.
Right now, car dealerships across Canada are trying to plan their inventory. They need to know what regulations they're operating under. Manufacturers are making decisions about production lines. And families in Thornhill and across the country who need a new vehicle are stuck wondering if the government is going to penalize them for buying what makes sense for their budget and their lives.
The government didn’t communicate this decision proactively. It took a tabled question in the House of Commons – one they were forced to answer – to cough up a timeline. What’s their strategy to communicate this to industry and consumers? To the Canadian public at large? If it wasn’t for this question, when were they going to tell people about the plan?
The Liberals designed a climate policy for the Canada they wished existed: dense, urban, and wealthy enough to absorb a $60,000 sticker price. They forgot about the other Canada. The one with no transit. The one where a truck isn't a lifestyle choice, it's how you get to work, haul your harvest, and get your kids to the hospital.
Please, try charging an EV in minus-thirty weather, and then schedule charging pit stops if you have a long commute that will only extend your trip. And the cherry on top, they completely ignored the infrastructure gap. Good luck finding a charging station when you're driving through most of rural Canada. It’s just not workable for so many people.
And then, the backlash grew too loud to ignore. Everyone from industry to opposition parties, to everyday Canadians were unhappy and forced the Liberals to pivot. But this is a government that treats transparency like it’s optional.
We've seen this movie before. Remember the ArriveCAN app? The promise to fix it came long before any actual accountability. The carbon tax? Years of broken promises about affordability. Every major Liberal policy follows the same script: announce, delay, deflect, repeat.
The failure to repeal this EV mandate is a perfect example of Liberal disconnect. They think a press release is a policy. But saying you'll do something and doing it aren't the same thing and the gap between those two is called leadership. They don't have it.
As Conservatives, our job is accountability. So we're going to keep asking for a date. Because when a government makes a promise, Canadians deserve to know when it will be kept, not just if.
This isn't about one mandate. It's about a pattern. A government that thinks Canadians are too busy or too distracted to notice when they're being managed instead of governed. Announcements instead of action. Talking points instead of transparency.
Canadians notice. They notice when promises have no deadlines. They notice when accountability is treated as optional.
We'll keep asking until we get a real date. Because that's what accountability looks like. And that's what Canadians deserve.
Stay tuned.


No surprise here!! Pretty words and no action or accountability! Keep on them for a response.
In fact, trey aren't truly repealing anything. They are replacing the "EV mandate" with the new tailpipe CO2 emissions requirements, which are so strict that it won't be possible to comply with them unless the majority of new cars will be electric.